What is the difference between subprime and predatory lending

Second, the expansion of the types of transactions covered is intended to improve the integrity of the data by establishing consistency in reporting requirements. Right now, loan data on refinancings and home improvement loans are unclear, and quite likely incomplete, because the regulation provides lenders a great deal of flexibility in determining which loans to report.

For example, lenders may avoid reporting closed-end home improvement loans by not classifying them as such in their records. Lenders also may choose not to report open-end home equity lines of credit, even if used for home improvement purposes. The proposal would tighten up these definitions so that the resulting data would be more complete and more consistent from one lender to the next. This change too seems certainly consistent with the spirit of HMDA.

Third, the proposal specifies that three new items be reported from a consumer loan or application: the annual percentage rate APR , whether the loan is subject to HOEPA, and whether the loan involves a manufactured home. The collection of data on mobile or manufactured home loans will provide for an improved understanding of this type of lending, which employs different underwriting criteria from those used for loans secured by conventional homes.

Because manufactured home loans have much higher denial rates than other mortgage loans, such data would also permit us to better understand denial patterns. But we should be able to agree that more information is an important prerequisite to sensible policies in this area.

At this point we have plenty of anecdotes about predatory lending but not much hard information. Increased HMDA data collection is the first step in gaining broader understanding of the business practices of subprime lenders and in helping us distinguish appropriate from inappropriate lending practices.

Beyond this, we should all recognize that the best defense against predatory lending is a thorough knowledge on the part of consumers of their credit options and resources. Educated borrowers who understand their rights under lending contracts and know how to exercise those rights can thwart predatory lenders. As the knowledge base of consumers grows, the market for credit-at-any-cost diminishes. Unfortunately, as is usually the case, the best solutions are often the most difficult to implement.

A massive educational campaign is needed to bring about this expanded consumer knowledge. But the Federal Reserve will continue to do its part through its consumer and industry education efforts. Both the Board and our twelve Reserve Banks will continue to promote our many programs designed to improve consumer financial education and literacy.

In these cases, a subprime loan may be the only option for financing homebuying. Subprime loans typically have higher interest rates and fees. This is because they serve higher-risk customers. Subprime loans are intended to last for the short-term, about years.

This gives the homeowner a chance to pay debts and improve their credit. Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance. Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. Predatory lending typically refers to lending practices that impose unfair, deceptive, or abusive loan terms on borrowers. In many cases, these loans carry high fees and interest rates, strip the borrower of equity , or place a creditworthy borrower in a lower credit-rated and more expensive loan, all to the benefit of the lender.

Through deceptive or fraudulent actions and a lack of transparency, they entice, induce, and assist a borrower to take out a loan that they will not reasonably be able to pay back. Predatory lending includes any unscrupulous practices carried out by lenders to entice, induce, mislead, and assist borrowers toward taking out loans they are otherwise unable to pay back reasonably or must pay back at a cost that is extremely high above market. Predatory lenders take advantage of borrowers' circumstances or ignorance.

A loan shark , for instance, is the archetypal example of a predatory lender—someone who loans money at an extremely high interest rate and may even threaten violence to collect on their debts. But a great deal of predatory lending is carried out by more established institutions such as banks, finance companies, mortgage brokers, attorneys, or real estate contractors. Predatory lending puts many borrowers at risk, but it especially targets those with few credit options or who are vulnerable in other ways—people whose inadequate income leads to regular and urgent needs for cash to make ends meet, those with low credit scores, the less educated, or those subject to discriminatory lending practices because of their race or ethnicity.

Predatory lenders often target communities where few other credit options exist, which makes it more difficult for borrowers to shop around. They lure customers with aggressive sales tactics by mail, phone, TV, radio, and even door to door. They use a variety of unfair and deceptive tactics to profit. Predatory lending is designed, above all, to benefit the lender. Classic predatory lending centers around home mortgages.

Their higher interest rates, banks would argue, reflect the greater cost of riskier lending to consumers with flawed credit. But even without deceptive practices, a subprime loan is riskier for borrowers because of the great financial burden it represents.

And with the explosive growth of subprime loans came the potential for predatory lending. When the housing market crashed and a foreclosure crisis precipitated the Great Recession , homeowners with subprime mortgages became vulnerable.

Subprime loans came to represent a disproportionate percentage of residential foreclosures. African American and Latinx homeowners were particularly affected.

Predatory mortgage lenders had targeted them aggressively in predominantly minority neighborhoods, regardless of their income or creditworthiness. Even after controlling for credit score and other risk factors such as loan-to-value ratio, subordinate liens, and debt-to-income ratios, data shows that African Americans and Latinos were more likely to receive subprime loans at higher costs.

Women, too, were targeted during the housing boom, regardless of their income or credit rating. African American and Latina women with the highest incomes were five times more likely than white men of similar incomes to receive subprime loans.

Other banks also paid settlements. But the damage to families of color is lasting. Homeowners not only lost their homes, but the chance to recover their investment when housing prices also climbed back up, contributing yet again to the racial wealth gap. In , the typical white family had eight times the wealth of the typical Black family and five times the wealth of the typical Latinx family. At any time, you can update your settings through the "EU Privacy" link at the bottom of any page.

These choices will be signaled globally to our partners and will not affect browsing data. We and our partners process data to: Actively scan device characteristics for identification. I Accept Show Purposes.

Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Home Ownership Mortgage. What Is a Subprime Loan? Key Takeaways Subprime loans have interest rates that are higher than the prime rate. Subprime borrowers generally have low credit ratings or are people who are perceived of as likely to default on a loan.

Article Sources. Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.