What is the difference between r01 and r21

However, if your proposed research will not require a long timeframe and you have limited preliminary data, an R21 grant may be a good choice. When you are trying to decide the best funding mechanism, RFA, or program announcement PA to apply for, your program officer is the best resource to help you make the decision. They are very familiar with the goals of each opportunity and can help you avoid wasting an application for a grant type that does not suit your particular needs and specific research project.

R01 grants are the most common research funding mechanism for independent investigators and can provide a long period of support with a large amount of funding support. R03 and R21 grants provide smaller amounts of support and are designed for smaller, feasibility projects that do not require as much time or funding. If you like our articles, try our workshops!

Our articles are based on the material from our scientific writing workshops, which cover these and many other topics more thoroughly, with more examples and discussion. We offer on-site workshops for your event or organization, and also host workshops that individual participants can attend.

Our on-site scientific writing workshops can range from hours to several days in length. We can tailor the length to suit your needs, and we can deliver a writing workshop as a stand-alone activity or as part of scheduled meetings.

Research Supplements. Choose an Award by Career Stage. Postdocs' Guide to Gaining Independence. Small Business Programs. High-Priority Areas of Interest. Small Business Grant Application Process. Cooperative Agreements. Investigator-Initiated Research. Concepts: Potential Opportunities.

See Funded Projects. Illustrated Grant Timelines. Timeline To Submit Your Application. Timeline for Assignment, Review, and Council. Timeline for Funding Decisions. Before the Due Date. Application and Review Cycles. Overview of R01 Process. Paylines and Budget Timing. Is an R01 Right for You? Is there a strong rationale for the proposed study? Do you have a proven track record of experience in the field, including publications in scientific journals?

Do you or your collaborators have sufficient expertise to accomplish the goals of the proposed work? For a principal investigator PI or biomedical institute seeking R01 award, your research has to be health-oriented, discrete and specific. It can be lengthy; may span anywhere between four to five years and still be covered by the grant. The uninterrupted flow of funds gives you plenty of time to pursue and complete project, publish findings and start crafting a new application should you require a secondary analysis.

R01 is particularly beneficial if you are a new- or early-career investigator because it requires little or no preliminary data. Your proposal, however, has to have a sound research approach and plausible medical solution to increase chances of success. As you apply for R01 grant, it is important to note that contrary to common belief, R01 grants are highly competitive and not easy to get by. You can find more information on the research cycle and due dates can be found here. The R03 supports small research projects planned for a short duration of time, i.

These projects can be:. The R03 grant is ideal if you have limited resources and need just a little bit of financial backup to broaden and round off the project. It is most suitable for student investigators who are pursuing studies for a dissertation. However, it does not cater to doctoral students. It is non-renewable. Like R01, R03 grant does not require preliminary data, but it can be included if you, being the PI, deem so. However, you need to be mindful of the fact that not all ICs provide R03 grants.

The R13 grant supports scientific meetings, societies, and conferences that are in line with the NIH healthcare agenda. R13 only supports domestic organizations though; foreign institutions are not eligible to apply. The R15 grant is reserved for institutes that are not major recipients of the NIH grants.

NIH-funded centers and program projects used to also be a reliable source of funds to initiate new projects. As these sources have disappeared, individual investigators are increasingly forced to turn to the R21 mechanism.

Study sections have become increasingly critical of R21 grants. While the R21 mechanism was originally designed to support innovative or transformational ideas with little or no preliminary data, in reality most study sections require a large amount of preliminary data, in addition to established and productive collaborations and prior publications in the new research area.

While the NIH seems to want to provide a funding mechanism for initiating exciting new projects, the members of study sections, all of whom have one or more R01 grants, see the R21 mechanism as a waste of time and money, and the general attitude is that none of these proposals is worth funding. The solution I suggest is to move all R21 review to special study sections that do not review R01 or P01 grants. In this way, the comparison and scoring would be amongst similar quality grants.

Perhaps more difficult to enforce, but another solution would be to bar R21 grants from presenting preliminary data, and thus the grant would be judged solely on innovation and transformative potential.

Overall, funding rates on both R21s and R01s are simply too low to support the solid national biomedical research infrastructure stated by NIH as a goal.

And the people who should be running the study sections to eliminate this requirement are not doing their job. Barring the R21s from having any preliminary data or publications relative to the proposal whatsoever is a great idea. This is all interesting, but I would like to see other types of grants included in this analysis.

I am frequently told here that R01s are a thing of the past, and that NIH is moving more and more toward large focused grants and RFAs.

This is being sold locally as dictating the kinds of scientists and programs that we should be focused on recruiting and building. Thus, it is not just R21 versus R01, but R grants competing with others.